Copyright Office Part 3: AI Training Fair Use
The Copyright Office concludes some AI training goes beyond fair use.
Whether you're creating with AI or protecting your work from it — get clear, practical guidance on copyright law, landmark cases, and compliance.
The Copyright Office concludes some AI training goes beyond fair use.
Anthropic offered to settle claims from 500K authors.
The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Thaler v. Perlmutter, confirming AI cannot hold copyrights.
| Case | Party | Status | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| NYT v. OpenAI | New York Times vs. OpenAI, Microsoft | Active - Discovery | NYT alleges millions of articles used to train Cha |
| Getty v. Stability AI | Getty Images vs. Stability AI | Active | 12 million images allegedly copied for Stable Diff |
| Thaler v. Perlmutter | Stephen Thaler vs. Copyright Office | Closed - SCOTUS Denied | AI cannot be author. Supreme Court denied cert Mar |
| Authors v. Anthropic | Andrea Bartz et al. vs. Anthropic | Settlement Rejected | 1.5B settlement rejected by judge. |
Whether you're protecting your creative work or using AI responsibly — we've got you covered.
Your work was scraped to train AI. Learn your rights, opt-out options, and whether you have a legal claim.
Using AI in your products or content? Stay compliant and avoid costly lawsuits with practical guidance.
Practical tools to help you navigate AI copyright — no signup required.
Weekly digest of new rulings, regulations, and practical guidance. Join 2,000+ creators and legal professionals.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.